Showing posts with label Improve Teaching. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Improve Teaching. Show all posts

Sunday, June 4, 2017

Standard 8 - Present Professional Practice to Colleagues

Teacher leaders will present professional practice for the review of colleagues.

As I reflect on my time in the Teacher Leadership program, I am reminded of where I began and where I have ended up. Prior to this program, I was not at all comfortable presenting information to my peers, especially things related to educational practice. I felt as though I did not have enough knowledge and experience to deserve the attention of my peers. As I have progressed through this program, I have grown in my confidence and knowledge and am now able to present information to peers and not feel out of my element.

Through classes like Accomplished Teaching and Survey of Instructional Strategies, we constantly and consistently researched various teaching practices that would work well in various classroom settings. In Accomplished Teaching, we looked at various teaching strategies that culminated in our Synthesizing Elements of Accomplished Teaching final paper. My focus at that time, as has been throughout this program, is figuring out how to differentiate well. Looking at differentiation as a means to open access to my content, math, has been a goal I have pursued for a while now. This goal is also something that most, if not all, teachers in my building are working toward as well. This is a pursuit I can help lead with the tools I have learned in this program.

Some of the differentiation tools I was introduced to through the Survey of Instructional Strategies class. The differentiation skills we learned dealt with what Hattie (2012) dubs, “Multiple Ways of Knowing” (emphasis in original, p. 113). There are many points of information in this particular section of the text, but the one that I find myself drawn to time and again is, “Materials presented in verbal, visual, and multimedia form provide richer representations than can a single medium” (p. 113). Utilizing multiple representations is something that I have worked on with my instructional coaches. During this program, I had the opportunity to work on implementing a Nonlinguistic Lesson Plan where student utilize a visual representation of functions that outline what they are and how to figure it out.

Another element dealing with differentiation we looked at deals with cooperative learning. Dean, Hubbell, Pitler, and Stone (2012) state, “cooperative learning provides opportunities for students to interact in ways that enhance and deepen their learning” (p. 37). In creating a lesson for cooperative learning, I had to work with fellow math teachers to utilize their knowledge of groupings. This shift to group learning was not easy for me and is not something I have done regularly. The utilization of nonlinguistic and cooperative learning are things that I could bring back to my school and help to engage teachers in shifting their focus and practice. This shift actually started in my work with my fellow math teacher on the collaborative inquiry project. We worked on helping our students to increase their confidence and persistence. Through the differentiation strategies mentioned above, we were able to begin helping students elevate their understanding and confidence.

In relation to helping others to improve their practice, I also had several opportunities to present information to our peers in class. Sharing our practice and things to look out for was beneficial for both the individuals presenting and those observing. This practice of presenting to our classmates was great practice for presenting to people at my school. It also helped drive home the difference in teaching students versus teaching adults. I have not had a ton of experience with teaching adults, so all the practice I have had through various presentations has been great for understanding that for adult teachers, learning occurs best when they can work collaboratively. When we worked together with people from different content specialties or different age levels, we were provided a view into the professional duties and practices of those we do not often see. As Zepeda (2013) states, “learning communities must be ready to confront the fragmented way in which schools are organized (e.g., departments, grade levels, and specialty groups such as gifted and talented), and they must be committed to working alongside each other as a collective to provide support” (p. 84). We must all work toward improving our schools. To do this, my role as a teacher leader must be to bring teachers together to tackle an issue within our school and to help others raise their level of practice together. It is always easier to work on a difficult situation or fix a long-standing issue with the help and support of our peers.

Dean, C., Hubbell, E., Pitler, H., Stone, B. (2012). Classroom instruction that works: Research-based strategies for incrasing student achievement. Colorado: McREL.

Hattie, J. (2012). Visible learning for teachers: Maximizing impact on learning. New York: Routledge.

Zepeda, S.J. (2013). Professional development: What works. New York, NY: Routledge.


Sunday, April 16, 2017

Standard 7 - Utilize Instructional Frames to Improve Teaching

Standard 7 - Teacher leaders utilize instructional frames to improve teaching.

Prior to entering the teacher leadership program, I had limited introduction and work with the various instructional frameworks. My district uses the Danielson framework for teacher evaluation so I have utilized this to help determine what areas of my practice to work on. Through the Leadership in Education class I was able to look at other frameworks, most notably the leadership standards pertaining to school leaders and administrators.

We were able to research the various standards that guide administrators and connect them to the standards that guide teachers. The evaluation goals assignment I completed allowed me to both become familiar with the principal criterion and how they may connect to the teacher criterion. For example, Washington Principal criterion 4 ("Principal Evaluation Criterion and Descriptors," n.d.) for  pertains to utilizing data to help increase student achievement and corresponds to criterion 6 in the eight criterion for Washington teacher evaluation ("Teacher Evaluation Criterion and Descriptors," n.d.). Both of these criterion require the use of data to drive all decisions made for students, or staff, within a school.

This requirement for attention to data coincides with a couple principles found in Spirituality in Educational Leadership. Sokolow and Houston provide the eight keys to leadership and the Principal of Intention and the Principal of Attention are closely tied to utilizing data in decision making (as cited in Houston, Blankstein, & Cole, 2008, pp. 14-15). This tie is not direct, or maybe even obvious, but as a leader, the intent behind your decisions is a necessary piece of information and the attention you give by divulging that you decisions are based upon the data at hand is a good way to conduct yourself as a leader.

We also had the opportunity to self-assess how we perceive our abilities as a leader when compared to the requirements of the Washington State Principal and Program Administrator Standards. In my evaluation, I was able to see how I would fare if I chose to become an administrator. This also provided me with a glimpse into the traits I need to embody to be a teacher leader. I found several areas that I feel are strengths for me, but the area in which I feel I am both strong and have work to do deals with socio-political actions and interactions. As a person, I feel that I am able to spread word and get knowledge of programs and services know. I also know that I struggle with making an impact beyond the local level to the community, city, county, and state.

Finally, we had the opportunity to critique the leadership components of our school. By looking at the leadership of our school and district, we were able to reflect on the direction our school is taking and how the decisions and decision making process plays out. This analysis influenced the way in which I see leadership in schools and how I will make decisions as a teacher leader. My school is switching to a comprehensive high school (we have been three small schools) and I believe that my influence on students, teachers, and the campus as a whole can increase. As we make this shift in the school, I will look to increase my influence on the matters and decision making processes of our school. The leadership standards we have studied will become an additional guide in improving both my teaching and leading.

Houston, P. D., Blankstein, A. M., & Cole, R. W. (eds.). (2008). Spirituality in Educational Leadership. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

Principal Evaluation Criterion and Descriptors (n.d.). In Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction. Retrieved from http://www.k12.wa.us/TPEP/pubdocs/PrincipalCriteriaDescriptors.pdf

Teacher Evaluation Criterion and Descriptors (n.d.). In Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction. Retrieved from http://www.k12.wa.us/TPEP/pubdocs/TeacherCriteriaDescriptors.pdf